PR 101 – Lesson 24 – Dealing with a hostile reporter and hostile media
Jeff Cole | August 17, 2009
So, you get a call from a Fox News producer – Bill O’Reilly wants you to appear on his show. Or you pick up your phone to hear a print reporter ask why your company is dumping toxic waste into the Old Mill Stream. Finally, the worst situation of all, you are watching a television show or reading a magazine story or a blog when you discover your company is the middle of a crisis because some advocacy group painted every company in your industry with the same brush.
In my over two-decade career as a reporter, I made some of those calls. In my somewhat shorter career as a public relations and marketing professional, I have responded to situations where an entire industry was painted with the same brush. In the later case, I was part of a team of three that crafted the first response to the first outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy or BSE, in a cow in the state of Washington. We successfully showed that our client, Smithfield Beef, was doing everything right to ensure no cow with BSE would ever enter its slaughterhouses.
Incidentally, I just demonstrated the first rule of responding to a hostile situation. Many people called BSE “mad cow.” We never, ever used that term – even during meetings in the office. “Mad cow” conjures up images of some Holstein frothing at the mouth, chasing Old McDonald around the fields. BSE is the scientific term and more accurate. We determined the terms of the battle before it was even joined.
The second rule we demonstrated was we responded within hours of getting the news about the BSE discovery. We didn’t wait to respond to someone else’s announcement. Now, we got one break. The news of the BSE-infected cow broke on the morning of Dec. 24, 2003. Because it was a holiday, most of those who would have attacked the meat producing industry were not in their offices. We essentially had the playing field to ourselves for about 48 hours – we were able to present the issue on our terms. Two news cycles passed before the Chicken Littles got revved up. By then, we had shaped the issue and the debate into what the meat industry was doing right.
Something to remember. An announcement like that of the cow infected with BSE is a neutral event. The government officials who usually release such news generally play it right down the middle. So, it is up to you to tell your side right away.
Another thing to remember – if you have genuinely made a mistake, admit it. Don’t try to spin it. In the case of the cattle and meat packing industries, the discovery of the infected cow showed what was being done right. The cow was found before it got into the system. It showed that the proper checks were in place. We didn’t need to spin anything. We just needed to get our story out before it got buried in the noise.
Trying to spin a mistake just gets you into more trouble. The media and bloggers will usually quickly pick up on your attempts. They will trumpet your efforts to hide what you did. You or your company will end up looking worse than if you had just said, “yeah, we were wrong. We are doing everything we can to correct the error.”
Now, being preemptive works very well when there is an event that could turn out bad. Handling a Sean Hannity or a Bill O’Reilly is done somewhat differently. Remember, you are playing by their rules. This isn’t neutral ground. What you are hoping for here is a draw. Not losing is the same as winning.
First, watch as many of the shows as possible before going on. Make sure you know what the topic is and do your research. These shows have a rhythm. They start out seemingly being neutral and then move into questions designed to do one thing – make the interview subject look bad. Objectivity is not their strong suit.
Here’s the key thing to remember when you find yourself the subject of one of those “interviews:” stay calm. Don’t lose your temper. They want you to get upset. It makes better television. Angry people don’t think and spew out the wrong kind of answer.
What you want to be is calm and boring. Boring makes lousy television. Answer the question, but don’t elaborate. If the interviewer tries to go off on tangent, don’t let it happen. Go back to the main subject and stay there. Give short declarative answers. Keep it boring.
Finally, you find there is the situation where find your company being criticized in the media and the Internet – and you had no idea it was happening. In this case, the blame is internal. You should have known that you had enemies out there. Most companies monitor conventional news outlets. Where they fall down is monitoring social media outlets – blogs, videos, etc.
Think that’s it’s not important to monitor those sites? Ask United Airlines about the country group Sons of Maxwell and its lead singer Dave Carroll. United baggage handlers broke Carroll’s $3,000 Taylor Guitar. Frustrated that the airline would do nothing to remedy the situation, Carroll recorded and posted a video on YouTube about his experience. As of Sunday, Aug. 16, the video had been viewed just under five million times. Now United did eventually step up and pay for repairing the instrument. It also said it wants to use the video in its employee training.
Still, think about the notoriety United gained from that one video. How many people chose to fly a competitor after watching that video?
United is just one example. Comcast, Proctor & Gamble and several other companies have felt the wrath of angry bloggers.
As I tell clients all of the time: “there is a conversation going on right now about your brand. You should be a part of it and leading it. But no matter what you do, it is going to happen anyway.”
Now, if it does happen, what to do is get involved in the conversation, quickly. Engage with the bloggers, talk to them and find out what the beef is. Proctor & Gamble was initially blind-sided by the Motrin Moms. But within 48-hours, the company had dealt with the problem and ended the furor.
In all these cases, the key is engagement and preparation. Do those things and at least you will never be surprised. And being ready is the most important thing to do.
Note: Check out my company’s new and improved website at JJC Communications.


I would have added something of course, but in fact says almost everything..
Jeff,
What a relief to read your side of the story. Having questioned some angles of news reporting, and public relations, I still believe in providing disclosure due to the amount of people who can, and will, spread their word locally, regionally, nationally and with the internet globally. Putting the right information out to the public through a crisis situation should allow trust to develop. Liken to an ugly divorce, it takes time to heal woundswith the amount of vicious attacks that follow which can harm a person and company.
The right choice of words does make a difference in relaying information. The internet and twitter, as information sources, can bring to question the ethics of a person, company and country instantly. Time heals, however not for all people who continue a vigilant approach and hand down their own ideas to their next generation, killing a brand.
No PR person or exec should be going on any of the big shows like The O’Reilly Factor or Hannity or wherever unless they have media training.
You mentioned one of the major mistakes people without it make: They get flustered, angry and defensive when the interviewer pins them against the wall.
By the way, the late Tim Russert was the master at finding derogatory quotes about his interview subjects and other nasty tidbits in public records and news clippings. Your tip about knowing what bloggers and others say about you is right on the mark.
Speaking of crisis communications, I think this week’s controversy with Whole Foods’ customers turning on the company because of its CEO’s public comments about the health care debate is fascinating. It will be interesting to see how the company responds.
Great blog. Very good advice for your readers and your clients.
Thanks.
Spence and I wrote a similar blog post yesterday. I would just augment your statement about handling certain media outlets by noting that political candidates are good examples at ‘handling the media’, with a few recent notable exceptions. Even with the Fox news ‘talking heads’, the trick is to avoid answering their question and simply ensure that your message is delivered. They might get frustrated but staying calm and reiterating your company’s vetted communication will ensure that you avoid getting trapped into saying anything at all that might (WILL) be taken out of context.
If I’ve learned anything over 20+ years in oil and gas communications, it’s that there is another option when the stew starts to bubble: batten the hatches and ride out the storm. Of course, if something blows up, get out with what you have and keep at it for as long as it takes. But if the local chapter of Protectors of the Arboreal Chub issues a press release accusing the company of possibly disrupting the critter’s monthly mating waggle, the company may be better served by not responding with anything other than to say it has the highest regard for the mating habits of the chub and regularly reviews its environmental policies and practices. Even with the blogosphere’s appetite for anything new with which to skewer the industry, plenty of stories simply die on the vine. It’s up to the PR professional to provide counsel to management on when to pull the trigger and possibly validate a dying story or when to politely decline the opportunity.
Very amusing as I once owned a City and Financial Services PR Company located by Smithfield meat market in the City of London ( CharterhouseStreet) Meat market porter would go round telling everyone ” No mad cows in this market – they are all in the offices” . Seriously having media trained countless businessmen and politicians since the 1970′s. Anyone not taking up media training if offered is a prize chump and deserves to be roasted. Broadcasters cannot hope to know all the ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of your firm so they rely on a format Who? What? Why? Where? When? and How? At one time we added another “Is it on the increase?” The Today Programme standby question if all else fails…
Any Prfirm worth its salt will have invested in an ISDN line and an audio codec unit . This way clients can reel off multiple radio and possibly Tv interviews at one sitting all from the comfort of the PR firms board room. They cost around £2,500 or can be hired in for around £50 a week
[...] PR 101 – Lesson 24 – Dealing with a hostile reporter and hostile media | PR 101 http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%E2%80%93-lesson-24-%E2%80%93-dealing-with-a-hostile-reporter-and-hostile-media – view page – cached Finally, you find there is the situation where find your company being criticized in the media and the Internet – and you had no idea it was happening. In this case, the blame is internal. You should have known that you had enemies out there. Most companies monitor conventional news outlets. Where they fall down is monitoring social media outlets – blogs, videos, etc. — From the page [...]
Its nice to see you make a post on this topic, I should bookmark this site. Just keep up the good work.