<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR 101 – Weekly Rant #20 – More Social Media Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/</link>
	<description>The inside scoop on public relations, marketing and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:55:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les règles de comportement en médias sociaux &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-4992</link>
		<dc:creator>Les règles de comportement en médias sociaux &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-4992</guid>
		<description>[...] billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les règles de comportement sur Twitter &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-4166</link>
		<dc:creator>Les règles de comportement sur Twitter &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-4166</guid>
		<description>[...] billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les règles de comportement sur LinkedIn &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Les règles de comportement sur LinkedIn &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>[...] la personne banni de LinkedIn donc soyez gentils.  Ce billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] la personne banni de LinkedIn donc soyez gentils.  Ce billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quels sont les règles de comportement sur les médias sociaux? &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>Quels sont les règles de comportement sur les médias sociaux? &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>[...] billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quelles sont les règles d&#8217;identification sur les médias sociaux? &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-3942</link>
		<dc:creator>Quelles sont les règles d&#8217;identification sur les médias sociaux? &#124; Blogue de Samuel Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-3942</guid>
		<description>[...] billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billet fut en partie inspiré du billet “PR 101: More Social Media Rules” de Jeff Cole ainsi que c’autres billets publier dans le passé, certains inspiré de billets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Renaud</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Renaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 12:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>As with Kyle I agree and disagree with your rules. I have been looking around your site and have very much enjoyed my stay; however, I would not have found this site but not for you Linked In post inviting me here. To some, that would be considered spam. You were not presenting a topic for discussion about fiction writing, you were asking people to come receive the service you are offering.

My point is, although I agree there could be some rules on social media sites, I don&#039;t think your list should be the starting point. I have no problem hitting the delete button or skipping over a post that is obviously of no interest to me. Do not stifle the freedom of speech, the government is already doing enough of that now.

Great blog otherwise, I will be back for a visit or two</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with Kyle I agree and disagree with your rules. I have been looking around your site and have very much enjoyed my stay; however, I would not have found this site but not for you Linked In post inviting me here. To some, that would be considered spam. You were not presenting a topic for discussion about fiction writing, you were asking people to come receive the service you are offering.</p>
<p>My point is, although I agree there could be some rules on social media sites, I don&#8217;t think your list should be the starting point. I have no problem hitting the delete button or skipping over a post that is obviously of no interest to me. Do not stifle the freedom of speech, the government is already doing enough of that now.</p>
<p>Great blog otherwise, I will be back for a visit or two</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 04:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>Of course they are things I don&#039;t like. The basis of all law in human society is something somebody didn&#039;t like. I am not saying I am Solon or James Madison. These are just things I think people should do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they are things I don&#8217;t like. The basis of all law in human society is something somebody didn&#8217;t like. I am not saying I am Solon or James Madison. These are just things I think people should do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 03:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>These rules seem self evident, but they are likely new to many, as social media yet is an unknown country to most. Maybe that explains the lack of comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These rules seem self evident, but they are likely new to many, as social media yet is an unknown country to most. Maybe that explains the lack of comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: physical therapist</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>physical therapist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sroth</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>sroth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 13:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>Jeff, love your rules!  so wanted to comment. I will be referencing them in my classes and giving you props.  My favorite comment you made was simple. Social Media is a community and every community needs rules! (something like that!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, love your rules!  so wanted to comment. I will be referencing them in my classes and giving you props.  My favorite comment you made was simple. Social Media is a community and every community needs rules! (something like that!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Blades</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 05:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff - 

I was waiting for your follow-up piece before I responded.  I wanted to make sure I understood where you were coming from before I admitted to disagreeing with you.

To be honest, as I read through your &quot;rules&quot; I felt like the piece should have been appropriately titled &quot;things I don&#039;t like.&quot;  Now, I will admit, a lot of the &quot;rules&quot; that you discuss I do not like as well.  I absolutely hate when people spam me but unfortunately, spam is in the eye of the beholder.  You talk about filling up inboxes but my clients and I have been accused of the naughty &quot;S&quot; word for simply posting multiple times to the same group.  For some people I can see how this would constitute spam but for people like me and you (I&#039;ve seen you name repeated several times in LinkedIn groups) it is simply viewed as providing value.  

And there in lies the problem with your &quot;rules;&quot; there is no black and white.  You can talk all day about what you do or do not like and I may agree 100% with you but that does not make it a rule.  You stated that a community needs rules or else it will slide into anarchy.  The beauty of social media is that it is a true democracy in the sense that if people decide your message is inappropriate, it will be ignored.  Any other guidance needed is bestowed upon us by the likes of the FTC or the executives at your social media platform of choice.  

My point is that, while I understand being irked by the way people use social media, it does not mean it breaks a rule.  The fact of the matter is that someone may break one of your &quot;rules&quot;  but be completely acceptable in my &quot;rule&quot; book.  And there in lies the value of social media.  We can pick and choose how, when and why we communicate with someone.  If a marketer does not use a form we like, we ignore them.  If enough people ignore them, they fail in their attempt.  You may call their failure a breaking of a &quot;rule&quot; but I have seen plenty of &quot;rules&quot; broken with great success and plenty of immaculate campaigns that end in failure.  

While you talk about the great wealth of connections that you have been able to acquire via social media, I like to talk about the breadth and depth of different companies that we have worked with.  It has been over the course of working with those companies that I have found no steadfast rules.  If your network has provided you with a different world view, I am very interested in learning who else adheres to, monitors and enforces your rules. 

I honestly greatly respect what you are doing but do respectfully disagree with your opinion.  

Thank you for breaching the topic,

Kyle Blades</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff &#8211; </p>
<p>I was waiting for your follow-up piece before I responded.  I wanted to make sure I understood where you were coming from before I admitted to disagreeing with you.</p>
<p>To be honest, as I read through your &#8220;rules&#8221; I felt like the piece should have been appropriately titled &#8220;things I don&#8217;t like.&#8221;  Now, I will admit, a lot of the &#8220;rules&#8221; that you discuss I do not like as well.  I absolutely hate when people spam me but unfortunately, spam is in the eye of the beholder.  You talk about filling up inboxes but my clients and I have been accused of the naughty &#8220;S&#8221; word for simply posting multiple times to the same group.  For some people I can see how this would constitute spam but for people like me and you (I&#8217;ve seen you name repeated several times in LinkedIn groups) it is simply viewed as providing value.  </p>
<p>And there in lies the problem with your &#8220;rules;&#8221; there is no black and white.  You can talk all day about what you do or do not like and I may agree 100% with you but that does not make it a rule.  You stated that a community needs rules or else it will slide into anarchy.  The beauty of social media is that it is a true democracy in the sense that if people decide your message is inappropriate, it will be ignored.  Any other guidance needed is bestowed upon us by the likes of the FTC or the executives at your social media platform of choice.  </p>
<p>My point is that, while I understand being irked by the way people use social media, it does not mean it breaks a rule.  The fact of the matter is that someone may break one of your &#8220;rules&#8221;  but be completely acceptable in my &#8220;rule&#8221; book.  And there in lies the value of social media.  We can pick and choose how, when and why we communicate with someone.  If a marketer does not use a form we like, we ignore them.  If enough people ignore them, they fail in their attempt.  You may call their failure a breaking of a &#8220;rule&#8221; but I have seen plenty of &#8220;rules&#8221; broken with great success and plenty of immaculate campaigns that end in failure.  </p>
<p>While you talk about the great wealth of connections that you have been able to acquire via social media, I like to talk about the breadth and depth of different companies that we have worked with.  It has been over the course of working with those companies that I have found no steadfast rules.  If your network has provided you with a different world view, I am very interested in learning who else adheres to, monitors and enforces your rules. </p>
<p>I honestly greatly respect what you are doing but do respectfully disagree with your opinion.  </p>
<p>Thank you for breaching the topic,</p>
<p>Kyle Blades</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention PR 101 – Weekly Rant #20 – More Social Media Rules &#124; PR 101 -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-20-%e2%80%93-more-social-media-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention PR 101 – Weekly Rant #20 – More Social Media Rules &#124; PR 101 -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=813#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by JeffCole53, JeffCole53. JeffCole53 said: PR 101 – Weekly Rant #20 – More Social Media Rules &#124; PR 101: http://bit.ly/9FQsxB [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by JeffCole53, JeffCole53. JeffCole53 said: PR 101 – Weekly Rant #20 – More Social Media Rules | PR 101: <a href="http://bit.ly/9FQsxB" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9FQsxB</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

