<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PR 101 &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pr101.biz/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pr101.biz</link>
	<description>The inside scoop on public relations, marketing and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:00:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PR 101 Weekly Rant #47  The Pollution of Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-weekly-rant-47-the-pollution-of-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-weekly-rant-47-the-pollution-of-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In social media, you want me to buy something reasons must be provided. Those reasons cannot come from the seller. Why should I believe the seller who has a clear self-interest in making things look good, no matter the real condition? I want third-party endorsements. That’s what influences my decision to buy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was inevitable that sooner rather than later, the multi-level marketers, the out-and-out salespeople, the spammers, and the promise-the-moon-for-a-nickel types would show in the social media arena. It was as inevitable as ants showing up at a picnic – and just as annoying.</p>
<p>The other day I received an email through my Linkedin offering to sell me a high-end golf villa near Disney World in Orlando. When I replied I wasn’t on Linkedin to have people try and sell me things, the emailer said he was trying to provide a service. Say what? A sales appeal is not a service.</p>
<p>Besides being incredibly tacky, the would-be seller violated a central tenant of social media. He was trying to push marketing by making statements that included “buy it now,” “there are limited quantities”, “they are going fast,” etc. Nowhere in the email did it tell my anything about these “villas.” Only that they were low-priced and they were seeking foreign buyers. There was a link provided.</p>
<p>In social media, you want me to buy something reasons must be provided. Those reasons cannot come from the seller. Why should I believe the seller who has a clear self-interest in making things look good, no matter the real condition? I want third-party endorsements. That’s what influences my decision to buy.</p>
<p>Incidentally, my ever-present Webster’s Dictionary defines villa as “a country house or estate, especially when large or luxurious and used as a retreat or summer home.” The company’s website says these “villas” are Villa Condominiums. A condo is defined as a multi-unit building or a series of connected buildings. So, saying something is a villa condominium is an oxymoron. Sorry, I am a language geek.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this kind of pitch is happening more often I am seeing posts promising 50,000 followers if I only do this or that. Would you really want to pick followers that way? It is true that I have a lot of followers on Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter. But I have never used any kind of automated program. I have built my following organically, one at time.</p>
<p>What these people are doing is not what social media is all about. Quite the opposite actually. I think it is fair to say social media became popular because of tactics like that erstwhile real estate salesman and others operating like that.</p>
<p>One of the largest appeals of social media to me is honesty. You expect people who marketing to be honest. If they are not they get outed. As I am sure you all know, that’s a very bad thing. Many a company has rued the day when they got caught fudging the truth.</p>
<p>On the same theme, I keep getting requests from people I have never met to endorse them. My rules for endorsement are I have to know you, worked with you, or had a long on-line relationship with you. I do not endorse strangers. I am lending my authority to people I endorse. It is not something I do lightly.</p>
<p>In fact, that is something that is beginning to disturb me about Facebook’s BranchOut. People join my “empire” and then I am asked to endorse them. I don’t know most of these people. I am sure they are fine people, but I just said I don’t endorse those I don’t know.</p>
<p>This is all just indicative of what can wrong with social media when the people who use don’t understand its purpose. What to do about it? Whenever you run into one of them, call them out. It is the only way to deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-weekly-rant-47-the-pollution-of-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PR 101 – Weekly Rant #15  March 31, 2010 High Pressure Marketing Is Not What Social Media Should be Used For</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-15-march-31-2010-high-pressure-marketing-is-not-what-social-media-should-be-used-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-15-march-31-2010-high-pressure-marketing-is-not-what-social-media-should-be-used-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many retailers are using the same techniques spammers use. It is not going to help the retailers sales.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going through one of my wife’s and my email inboxes the other day. It struck me that I was deleting a lot of messages from legitimate retailers. Why was I doing that? Because they send a lot – too many to be honest.</p>
<p>My wife and I get a lot of emails – both personal and professional. Between us, we have four addresses. I am talking about receiving perhaps 200 message a day or more. Many of them are for me. I monitor a lot of different social media trends and belong to a lot of different sites. I follow those sites via either RSS feed or email.</p>
<p>There is no problem with that part of my email load. In fact, most of the professional sites to which I belong has policies limiting themselves to one message a week or one a day. What bothers me is the retailers to whom I have given my email address.</p>
<p>I am a very picky about where I shop and what I buy. I have rules about comfort, style and ingredients. As much as possible, my wife and I shop at stores headquartered in Milwaukee or Wisconsin. Because Wisconsin produces everything from cheese to underwear to cleaning products, it isn’t hard.</p>
<p>We also tend to be loyal to the companies who produce what we view as good things. Because of that, we follow those companies on their social media sites. We also used to sign up for their email lists. We don’t do that so much anymore.</p>
<p>Why? Because these retailers don’t seem to understand there’s a limit to how many emails should be sent. It get’s very annoying very quickly. What’s really annoying is when the same retailer sends multiple copies of the same email. I know this is an automated marketing tool these retailers use. I also know that times are tough for retailers right now. I know they are desperate to drum up business anyway they can. The recession has hit them particularly hard.</p>
<p>I also know they are not going to dig themselves out of it by annoying their customers. I get so many emails from some of them that my spam filter kicks in. That’s annoying because I then have to go through my spam filter to sort through the messages.</p>
<p>I know these retailers are not spammers. They are not trying to sell me a timeshare in Kuala Lumpur or tell me I won the Irish lottery. (Don’t ever try that last one on someone who knows Ireland. It ain’t gonna work. My grandfather used to buy me Irish lottery tickets. I know how the Irish lottery works.) Yet, sometimes they act like spammers – they send out multiple emails each week trying to get me to buy something.</p>
<p>I try to be a careful shopper. I check online reviews, talk to friends, and compare prices. I am a very good collector of information. I don’t need five emails in one week from a retailer.</p>
<p>What usually ends up happening is that I will skim the message line. If it doesn’t grab my attention right away, I just delete the email. It never gets opened. I am way too busy building my business. I don’t have time to wade through 20 or 30 emails from companies that want me to buy something.</p>
<p>That means the company loses a sale. I suspect I am not alone in this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-%e2%80%93-weekly-rant-15-march-31-2010-high-pressure-marketing-is-not-what-social-media-should-be-used-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PR 101 &#8211; Lesson 50 – Another blog on social media etiquette</title>
		<link>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-lesson-50-%e2%80%93-another-blog-on-social-media-etiquette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-lesson-50-%e2%80%93-another-blog-on-social-media-etiquette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hiring managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr101.biz/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since posting the very popular rant last Wednesday on there being too many social media sites, I have had some requests for a post on what is proper social media etiquette. I wrote on the same subject almost a year ago. Like Emily Post did, I think it is time to update.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Since posting the very popular rant last Wednesday on there being too many social media sites, I have had some requests for a post on what is proper social media etiquette. I wrote on the same subject almost a year ago. Like Emily Post did, I think it is time to update. So, let’s get to it.</p>
<ul>
<li>Let’s start at signing up for a site. Think of yourself as being at a party or in a meeting. You would tell people your real name, something about yourself and what you do. It’s no different in social media. So:
<ul>
<li>First, use your real name – not something cute. This is the only way that people are going to know you. If you were hunting for an employee, or hiring someone to perform a service, would you hire “drunkguy05” or “sexxxygirl02?” Plus, if you want to be found, the odds are much better if you use your real name.</li>
<li>Second, post a picture of yourself, not your dog, not a pretty sunset, or some weird avatar. People want to know what you look like. Why wouldn’t you post your own picture? You on the run from the law?</li>
<li>If you have one, include a link to a blog, another site such as LinkedIn or Facebook. This shows you are a real person. Definitely link to your website if you have one.</li>
<li>Include a short bio of yourself. Again, this gives people an idea of who you are.</li>
<li>This next rule should be obvious, but people violate it all the time. DO NOT SPAM. If you are joining a site simply to sell me something, go away. That’s not the purpose of social media. I am glad you asked – it is to have a conversation, link with like-minded people and share information. It is not to buy real estate in Goa, or some system that promises me I will get rich working five a hours a week. Or a system that makes me into a spammer. If I get those kind of invitations, I will block you, and I will report you to the site administrators. Of course, that goes double for all of those porn people out there.</li>
<li>Once you sign up for a site, it is perfectly acceptable to invite your friends – <span style="text-decoration: underline;">once.</span> Not six times. As I said last week, if I don’t respond to your invitation, it means I don’t want to join. After the third time, I am going to send you to my spam filter, never to return. And know something about the people you are inviting. As a personal example, I am an Apple; I will never be a PC. So don’t invite me to join Windows Live. It is not going to happen.</li>
<li>On that subject, there is quantity versus quality debate in social media. Some experts argue that the idea is to accumulate as many followers as possible. Their thesis goes you want to distribute whatever you are sending out to the widest possible network. The other side it is better to be followed by a 100 people who are influencers in their networks. I come somewhere in the middle. It is up to you to decide. However, this is not high school – the person with the most friends does not win.</li>
<li>After you join a site, get active on it. Why else would you join?  That doesn’t mean you have to spend every waking minute posting. But, if you join Twitter, tweet twice a day. If you are Facebook, post an update or two each day. You get the idea. I will not follow anyone who invites me to join a site, but has done nothing there themselves.</li>
<li>As part of the above bullet, respond to other people’s post. That’s just good manners. If you want people to respond to what you do, you should have the courtesy to do the same for them.</li>
<li>Another thing for you LinkedIn people &#8211; unless you know someone personally or have worked closely with them, don&#8217;t recommend them. And do not send out blanket requests for recommendations to total strangers. How good could a recommendation be if you nothing about someone? Plus, what if you called by a potential employer who asks you about some stranger you recommended? You are going to look dumb and the odds are very good that the candidate will not get the job.</li>
<li>A final note – there is no privacy in social media. Well really, there is no privacy in the Internet Age period. So, if you don’t want people to know something, don’t post it anywhere. Things on the web never really go away. Along those lines, all of you college kids who have those really cool photos of that weekend in Cabo where you took your clothes off and jumped into the ocean &#8211; take them down. Many companies will not hire someone if they see such photos. Yeah, it is not fair, but that’s the way it is.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pr101.biz/pr-101-lesson-50-%e2%80%93-another-blog-on-social-media-etiquette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

